ISSUES   |   SOLUTIONS

newsdate: 
Tue, 08/10/2010

By the Dayton Daily News | Sunday, August 8, 2010, 12:00 AM

Gov. Ted Strickland made a splash at the dead Grand Lake St. Marys — not in the water, of course, lest he come down with something deadly.

Just politically speaking.

He brought high-ranking state officials with him, and he promised there’d be new regulations on farms that are fouling the water with the phosphorous that spawns toxic algae blooms.

The day after his July 30 visit, U.S. Rep. John Boehner also met with residents and local officials. He promised he’d ride the U.S. Agriculture Department about contributing money to help mitigate the environmental debacle that has forced people off of the water and is literally destroying a local economy.

You might ask: If this is all it took to get things on track, why weren’t these things done sooner?

Well, this isn’t all it’s going to take, and actually there wasn’t anything of significance accomplished by the politicians stopping by.

The regulations that Gov. Strickland touted aren’t scheduled to take effect for two years. That means that farmers can keep spreading manure on frozen crop land, sending phosphorous-laced runoff into the creeks that connect with Ohio’s largest inland lake. They will be encouraged to adopt practices that control the runoff, but they wouldn’t be ordered to — not yet anyway.

Rep. Boehner’s support for $1 million in emergency funding didn’t take any special effort, and, anyway, that’s not even a down payment on what it will cost to clean up the lake.

It’s an amazing thing to have a lake die and to have an entire community living with the smell of death. This is not a noxious pond that we’re talking about. It’s a 13,500-acre reservoir that has been supporting an estimated $200-million annual tourist industry.

It’s just Gov. Strickland’s bad luck that he’s in charge of the state when this happened. Of all of Ohio’s contemporary governors, he’s been in office the shortest amount of time during the period that this problem has been building. Literally, the state and its regulators have been on notice for years, even decades, about the threat.

While to blame him would be ridiculous, the governor can’t ride into town and suggest he wants to help, but then give in to pleas by agri-business and farmers that they need time to figure out how to install filters and store their animals’ manure.

They have known that this day was coming. They’ve known that nationally the pressure is on to prevent agricultural runoff because it’s threatening the water quality in rivers and oceans. Time’s up in Ohio.

One good thing that’s going on is that people are proposing ideas and reaching out to experts. There are debates about massive chemistry experiments involving alum and other concoctions to counteract the phosphorous. People are challenging the state’s notion that dredging is out of the question (because it’s too expensive), suggesting that it might be part of the solution. Good, hard questions are being asked.

Because people are so angry and scared about the jobs that are drying up, the drop in their property values and the possibility that a stunning resource could be destroyed for decades or even forever, there’s finally a sense of urgency.

But let’s be clear: While the Grand Lake St. Marys community has to do its part to understand the options, to identify technical experts and to have the conversations that promote public education, it doesn’t have the money to pay for any remedies. That will have to come from the very governments that didn’t want to push the farming operations in Mercer and Auglaize counties to stop harming others’ livelihoods, property and possibly their health.

Wait two years to stop the practices that fouled this lake? Allow people to keep doing the very thing that is costing taxpayers money that they shouldn’t have to pay in the first place?

The governor, agricultural lobbyists and the farm owners can’t be serious.

Our state government hasn't a clue. The public isn't as dumb as they would like to think. We understand the difference between motion and progress.

If our state government was a crew of medics at an accident, they would be debating who is going to adminster CPR!

Take action for God Sake. Business is passing away. ODNR and EPA are suppose to be the experts. Do your job and save this lake.....NOW!

Submitted by Carpe Diem! (not verified) on Tue, 08/10/2010 - 9:46am.


Agreed. Wake up Strickland ! The time is now....giving the farmers and ag two years is non-sence. Don't want to offend anyone? What about the restaurant owner that has tables sitting empty? What about the marina's that have no boats to fix or no one to buy there fuel or boats? What about the camp grounds going vacant? What about the the real estate agents and property owners that can't give there prpertys away? What about the hotels that are vacant?
What about the people that are getting sick? Are you concerned about offending them? In my opinion the
$ 200 million a year in revenue to the region is just the tip of the muck ! Dredge the lake, create the islands, get busy !

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 08/11/2010 - 7:09am.


It takes time to plan and build manure storage. Is what the lake people or the farmers want? NO!!!!!! The reality is it will still take time. You can not get around that. What is needed is all the bad comments that are being made about farmers to stop. None of us meant to ruin someone's living by applying fertilizer to our farm ground. We were doing what we thought was necessary to make a living. So now we are fixing it but it would be nice to get some acknowledgement that we are fixing the problem.
At Monday's farmer meeting, we found out that the "P" load coming into the lake has been reduced by HALF during 2009. Those facts came from the monitoring station on the Big Chickasaw and were compared to the TMDL load of 2007 and 2008. Wow, cut by half, who could have guessed that the conservation practices that have been done and will continue to get done would have done that.
I was very excited with that news. Because at the Saturday's LIA meeting, we were told that the conservation practices were NOT working based on the facts that Mr. Ringo had presented. Now, I was pretty angry and confused on Saturday so I did some thinking and research on my own. Guess what I figured out, that Mr. Ringo had chosen the facts that he wanted to present so that he could come up with a conclusion that fit his cause. I believe his cause is to do anyway with winter manure hauling but guess what that is already going to happen. In 2012, winter manure hauling will not be allowed but Mr. Ringo knew that or at least had an idea that it was coming. He really did not need to stir up the crowd with only telling what he wanted you to hear. This is not the first time this has happened with this organization but I will save that for another comment.

Submitted by Theresa Howick (not verified) on Wed, 08/11/2010 - 8:51pm.


Time to Plan???
There was an article in the Daily Standard back in the 70's regarding the pollution in Grand Lake and where the majority of it was coming from - Manure Run-off. The problems have been ignored for 30 years, but you state the Farmers still want time to plan??? People in the watershed have known what effect they were having on the lake and their surrounding communities but they flat didn't care. While listening to some of the recordings of the meetings with the Farmers I got very upset. It was stated over and over that they knew they were on borrowed time but this summer brewed a perfect storm. Again, they have know but wouldn't step up to do the right thing unless someone paid them or they were required. They didn't care about the lake so now I don't care about the hardships they may face to do the RIGHT thing for their surrounding communities!

Why is our tax dollars going to the Farming Community for them to do what is RIGHT?

You stated: None of us meant to ruin someone's living by applying fertilizer to our farm ground.
You criticize Mr. Ringo for not giving all the facts, but it is you who is not even dealing with the facts. Fertilizer??? The majority of the Farmers in the GLSM watershed are not applying manure to fertilize their land; they are doing it to dispose of it.

I am happy to hear conservative practices have reduced the “P” load coming into the lake by half and it seems you are looking for a pat on the back for a job well done. Guess what; you will not get that from me because the job is not even close to being done.

One million of Taxpayers dollars was given to the watershed farmers last year to initiate the conservative practices you speak of. So they got paid to do the right thing. And now this year they are receiving even more money. What ever happened to the Farmers being the moral backbone of the community? It seems greed and selfishness has over taken Grand Lake’s Watershed Farmers.

There is still way too much “P” coming into the lake and it must stop today!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 08/13/2010 - 12:26pm.


I am truly disappointed at Theresa Howick's blog. The members of the LIA that were in attendance at the farmers meeting last Monday night were very respectful and offered no criticism whatsoever relating to past manure mangement practices in public at that meeting. The LIA mission is to help wherever we can to restore the lake to its once greatness. While there remain some in the watershed who would prefer to continue to use it as their personal sewer, the vast majority realize the economic value to all area communities for recreation.

Sadly Ms. Howich failed to mention in her blog the actual increase in livestock count over the past decade and the affect that has had on the watershed. Theresa,if you are intent with dealing with facts, then let's indeed deal with all the facts!

Submitted by Bob Sachs (not verified) on Fri, 08/13/2010 - 6:20pm.


The TMDL loads, "2007/2008", that are referenced above, were estimated reference numbers that were developed by "borrowing" flows, etc. from other watersheds and cannot be used for comparison to the actual results reported from the station, or to prove anything.
From the NRCS report:
"The TMDL involves a considerable level of uncertainty, as flow data had to be “borrowed” from a nearby watershed, and minimal concentration data were available. Thus comparisons between WY2009 results and values in the TMDL should not presume that the TMDL is correct, but can be used to put both sets of numbers in context."
And: "This over-estimation is particularly large in the lower flow classes."
From the NRCS summary: "Annual loads of total phosphorus and nitrate nitrogen observed in WY2009 were substantially less than those estimated in the Grand Lake St. Marys TMDL (TP 60%, NO3 40%). However the WY2009 loads were much greater than the TMDL target loads (TP 11 times the target load, NO3 18 times)."
HERE IS A FACT from page 2 of the report: Ohio EPA suggests the following draft nutrient standards for protection of aquatic life (Warm Water Habitat): total phosphorus <0.10 mg/L, total dissolved nitrogen < 1.0 mg/L. In these streams, nitrate plus nitrite constitutes most of the total dissolved nitrogen. The percent of daily average concentrations that exceed these draft standards are: 'the TP and N levels were exceeded 82.6 and 67.1% of the days sampled in WY2009.'
This is totally unacceptable and should be ILLEGAL.

Submitted by Craig Riesen (not verified) on Sat, 08/14/2010 - 7:33am.